For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. |
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second. |
For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion sought for a second. |
For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another. |
For if that first covenant had been without defect, there would have been no room for another one or an attempt to institute another one. |
For if that first testament had been faultless, in that case there would not have been a constant searching out of a place for a second. |
If the first agreement had proved satisfactory there would have been no need to look for a second. |
For if the first covenant had been faultless, there could have been no room for a second one. |
For 1063 if 1487 that 1565 first 4413 covenant had been 2258 faultless, 273 then should no 3756 - 302 place 5117 have been sought 2212 for the second. 1208 |
- No cross references or parallel passage have been cited for this verse.
- First Fruits, Tithes and Offerings - Darryl Samuels - ( in Adobe/pdf format ) A brother confronted with erroneous and false teachings about tithes and offerings, especially the “first fruits,” shares the results of his decision to research the Bible for himself.